I work in the cancer field and recently read a research article that intrigued me (1). It has to do with how well people recovered after stem cell transplantation (getting their immune system replaced after theirs has been damaged/destroyed by chemotherapy and radiation). The article implied that the amount of close contact spent with a partner, close relative or friend improved the health outcomes of these patients. This benefit didn’t occur with social visits; it appeared that the quality of the relationship mattered more than the numbers of friends coming by.
The question then arises as to what determines the ‘quality’ of a relationship, and how this may support our health and well-being. The traits society glamorizes (beauty, wealth, power and fame) don’t hold relationships together and probably even contribute to their downfall. Since these ‘desirable’ characteristics don’t sustain enduring, nurturing connections, what does? Paradoxically, the foundation of relationship comes from beyond all external attributes, from what psychologist Carl Rogers termed ‘unconditional positive regard’.
This vision arises when we experience our own unconditioned awareness, which enables us to turn towards others with a space of quiet compassionate presence. When we recognize and affirm this, we can ‘just be there’ for our friends, relatives or partners. We then provide a comforting steady support for them, one that accepts them completely regardless of their personality or circumstances. This connection reduces their stress and anxiety surrounding their illness. For these cancer patients, knowing they had someone there for them unconditionally may have boosted their immune system, leading to better health outcomes. Of course we can extend this to all of us, as ‘just being there’ for someone may be healing on many levels.
Foster, LW., Mclellan, LJ. Survival of Patients Who Have Undergone Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplantation: The Relative Importance of In-Hospital Lay Care-Partner Support. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, Vol 22 (2), 2004.



